Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Daughters Of Shmuel's Father
Hashkafah.com > Thinking Jewish > Gemara/Mishna Discussions > Moed
critic
I just thought that it was interesting to note that the gemara consistenly refers to Shmuel's sisters as 'the daughters of Shmuel's father' instead of just saying 'Shmuel's sisters.'

Also, Shmuel's father prohibited his daughters from sleeping in the same bed, because he was worried that if they engaged in homosexual acts, they would become assur to the kohen gadol. Why was this his worry? The beit hamikdash wasn't around then! All tosfot says is that he was 'machmir.'

Does anyone have any other insights into this?
Nechama
Is this Shmuel the Shmuel HaNavi?
critic
No, this Shmuel is much later. His father was Abba bar Abbah.
Nechama
Ok, there goes my theories. (The Miskan and The daughters from other wife)
shim
Maybe they had different mothers.
melech
The Soncino says the girls were instructed to avoid that sort of thing because of decency, in spite of the Beit Hamikdash having been destroyed:
QUOTE
Sc. to marry a High Priest, who must marry none but a virgin (Lev. XXI, 13), for their lewdness destroys their virginity. Though there were no High Priests in his days, he nevertheless objected to this on grounds of decency, and therefore may have taken steps to prevent it. — V. Weiss, Dor, II, 23.

I'm guessing the girls are referred to as the daughters of their father because in this context it was the father who was setting the rules, not the brother.
critic
QUOTE(melech @ Jul 6 2005, 02:50 PM)
The Soncino says the girls were instructed to avoid that sort of thing because of decency, in spite of the Beit Hamikdash having been destroyed:
QUOTE
Sc. to marry a High Priest, who must marry none but a virgin (Lev. XXI, 13), for their lewdness destroys their virginity. Though there were no High Priests in his days, he nevertheless objected to this on grounds of decency, and therefore may have taken steps to prevent it. — V. Weiss, Dor, II, 23.

It's surprising that he would have such a chashad. How much more so for us?

QUOTE
I'm guessing the girls are referred to as the daughters of their father because in this context it was the father who was setting the rules, not the brother.
[right][snapback]262157[/snapback][/right]

In which case it should just say Abba bar Abba's daughters, and not mention Shmuel at all.

My maggid shiur said that Abba bar Abba had such admiration for his son that he preferred to be called the father of Shmuel, instead of his real name.
shim
QUOTE(critic @ Jul 7 2005, 11:33 AM)

It's surprising that he would have such a chashad.  How much more so for us?


I don't follow your kal vechomer.

QUOTE

My maggid shiur said that Abba bar Abba had such admiration for his son that he preferred to be called the father of Shmuel, instead of his real name.
[right][snapback]262753[/snapback][/right]
Alternatively, maybe the custom then was like the middle eastern custom where fathers are referred to upon the birth of their oldest son as "Abu ___" instead of their given name.
critic
QUOTE(shim @ Jul 7 2005, 11:49 AM)
QUOTE(critic @ Jul 7 2005, 11:33 AM)

It's surprising that he would have such a chashad.  How much more so for us?


I don't follow your kal vechomer.

All I'm saying is that if someone as great as Avuha d'Shmuel would be worried about his daughters having homosexual inclinations, all the more so, we should be careful.
shim
QUOTE(critic @ Jul 7 2005, 11:52 AM)
QUOTE(shim @ Jul 7 2005, 11:49 AM)
QUOTE(critic @ Jul 7 2005, 11:33 AM)

It's surprising that he would have such a chashad.  How much more so for us?


I don't follow your kal vechomer.

All I'm saying is that if someone as great as Avuha d'Shmuel would be worried about his daughters having homosexual inclinations, all the more so, we should be careful.
[right][snapback]262771[/snapback][/right]

I still don't get it. The chumra of greater people don't necessarily apply to lesser people. And maybe he knew his daughters and that this would be something to be concerned about.
melech
QUOTE(shim @ Jul 7 2005, 11:49 AM)
Alternatively, maybe the custom then was like the middle eastern custom where fathers are referred to upon the birth of their oldest son as "Abu ___" instead of their given name.
[right][snapback]262765[/snapback][/right]

That would make a name like Abba Eban (or in Arabic, Abu Ibn) pretty non-descript and circular.
shim
QUOTE(melech @ Jul 7 2005, 02:11 PM)
QUOTE(shim @ Jul 7 2005, 11:49 AM)
Alternatively, maybe the custom then was like the middle eastern custom where fathers are referred to upon the birth of their oldest son as "Abu ___" instead of their given name.
[right][snapback]262765[/snapback][/right]

That would make a name like Abba Eban (or in Arabic, Abu Ibn) pretty non-descript and circular.
[right][snapback]262863[/snapback][/right]

biggrin.gif
shim
simpleTorah still hasn't been cleared for access to this forum yet, so he asked me to post the following:

QUOTE
Abbuha de-Shmuel was not concerned only about his own daughters acting inappropriately. He was also of the REJECTED opinion (Kesubos 51b) that a raped woman is forbidden to her Yisrael husband since she may have aquiesed in the course of the rape.
Gabbe
Just to be clear, Avuha D'Shmuel was not concerned about lesbian acts in of themselves. Rather, he was afraid that they would come to lust actual sex. Lesbianism is assur, from Maaseh Eretz Mitzraiyim.
Yes, this didn't add anything constructive to the conversation. Live with it.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.