QUOTE(shaya_getzl @ Feb 19 2007, 03:33 PM) [snapback]795760[/snapback]
If by "multiple platforms" you mean same car sold under a dozen names, then yes, historically GM beats even Ford in that department ...
The platform is the chassis usually with a few different transmissions/engines/suspension variations. For example the GM W-body platform cost 5 Billion to develop and was used for dozens of models and was introduced in 1988 (it's still in use, but has undergone many revisions). If GM can get together with its Asian, European and Australian R&D centers and make 7 basic platform (compact, mid-size, FWD full size, RWD mid-large size, SUV, Luxury mid-size, luxury full size) to be shared among them all, they could justify upgrading after three years and then launching a new platform after five as opposed to upgrading every 5-7 years and launching a new platform every 15-20 years.
This would do more for GM then anything else as it could genuinely compete and beat the European and Japanese products, instead of relying on styling (which it hasn't been great at) and price.
QUOTE(investor relations @ Feb 19 2007, 04:02 PM) [snapback]795794[/snapback]
Being that its obvious they cant exist without each other, why shouldn't it get approved?
I agree, but the flip side is they can now charge what they like and provide poor service and nobody could do anything about it. I think it well get through because the service is far from a necessity and if they hike the price people will just stop using the product.