QUOTE(Kalashnikover_Rebbe @ Oct 1 2007, 09:16 PM)

Which in itself I find very insulting and condescending. If you don't want ME there, that is fine and your prerogative. But don't have the audacity to tell me what I do and don't want and make decisions FOR me based on that assumption. You MAY be right, but it is still NOT your decision to make and rude to do so IMHO.
Why is it rude, audacious, and making decisions for you to infer that male and females are different and often have different interests? Just because modern society yells about equality and how men and women are the same in all areas, won't most people agree that there are ceratin things that men enjoy more and certain things that women enjoy more? Would you be as upset if there was some all-guys poker game or beerfest going on? I certainly wouldn't feel left out by not being invited.
Is your issue the fact that there is a women's only meet to begin with or the fact that I dared to write that a kiddie-friendly park meet is probably more of a women's meet?
QUOTE(Kalashnikover_Rebbe @ Oct 1 2007, 09:16 PM)

It would bother me MUCH more. At least with frum people I can dan l'chaf zechus that there are frumkeit considerations at play here, as well as the general uneasiness between members of the opposite sex who are used to being separated. But in the secular world there is NO good excuse for such a thing...
K - do you really thing there is never a time or place to have things that are all female or all male? Have you ever heard of seperated SORORITY or FRATERNITY parties? OMG!! How could the secular world DARE seperate guys and girls?!
QUOTE(Kalashnikover_Rebbe @ Oct 1 2007, 09:16 PM)

Why would girls WANT to have an event with no men present (for reasons other than modesty)? How would MY presence (in terms of my maleness, not ME personally) in any way detract from the event? Answer that and you will understand why it upsets me...
Maybe it's different for guys, but I know that there's a difference in the atmosphere for many girls if there are guys around or not. It's not as relaxed and 'be yourself' as an all-women's event is. I personally am comfortable in either situation, but I can understand those who are not comfortable in a co-ed environment. Also, some girls b'shita don't feel comfortable going to a co-ed event. It's not their 'thing' to spend time hanging out with guys who they aren't dating or married to.
QUOTE(Kalashnikover_Rebbe @ Oct 1 2007, 09:16 PM)

What if it were a "whites only" get together? or an "Ashkenazi only" get together? What about a sign "No Jews or Dogs"? Would you still defend it so eagerly?? It is one thing to plan an event with a certain demographic in mind, but quite another to EXCLUDE others who may express interest in participating....
K - I think you are blowing this WAY out of porportion by comparing a women's only event, which is QUITE common in frum circles, to one where they don't accept Jews. By making an event co-ed - which BTW - a VAST majority of our meets are, we are EXCLUDING some who don't feel comfortable going to anything but an all women's meet. Why don't those people matter to you at all?
BTW, in case you are interested, I dug up an old thread about a
meet for only guys which you might be interested in bashing as well. Maybe you were MIA then, but here's your chance to talk about how unfair it is to only invite guys to a meet.
QUOTE(politico @ Oct 1 2007, 09:19 PM)

annoying questions, mostly.
You mean you don't want to deal with annoying questions being asked to you, right.