QUOTE (krumlikeapretzel @ Feb 5 2008, 01:30 PM)

What I don't understand from the pashkevil is that it first seems to call for a yom tfillah against partitioning J'm and then goes on listing a series of things that from the OPS point of view would be advantages of such a partition. So I'm perplexed...
None of those things would be solved by partition. They are all a result of the evil wayward Zionist Entity which would continue to do so.... (except maybe for letting Jews on Har Habayis) and all take place in areas which will remain under Israeli control
QUOTE
Are they calling for a yom tfillah to keep J'm united and save the mixed Jewish-Arab school, the stores that sell pork and gay pride? Or are they calling for a yom tfillah to pray for a divided J'm where they could get rid of the Israeli flags next to the Kosel and stop the neemanei har habayit from chas vesholom following the Rambam and bringing a korban tomid or korban pesach betumah?*
The Arabs are
more likely to allow Karbanos than the current "enlightened" Israeli government.....
QUOTE
ETA: The fact that the pashkevil is endorsed by both Agudas Yisroel and lehavdil degel, it creates a stirah... do you follow the Gerer, Belzer, etc. rebbes and join the yom tfilah, or do you follow the mesorah of doing the exact opposite of the misnagdim's recommendations and don't join the yom tfilah?
1. I'm not at ALL convinced that Agudas Yisrael OR Degel HaTorah wrote or approved this poster. This is NOT they way they speak, and it sounds to me like some more Right Wing Anti-Zionist (read Hungarian) elements are using some "poetic license" in their names.
2. For some, having the Gerrer or Belzer Rebbes say something is not significantly different than if it comes from the 'snags...
QUOTE
*ETA #2: Please tell me that the gdeilei hateirreh shleeteh's definition of a united J'm is not "united under *Palestinian* control"...
Not unless the Palestinian government promises them more money than the current regime.....